Rechercher dans ce blog

Saturday, October 31, 2020

Through Hard Work, Buffalo Farm Becomes Successful - Spectrum News

hard.indah.link

Struggles, perseverance, and ultimately success: Terra Dumas, owner of Buffalo’s Common Roots Urban Farm, knows these words very well.


What You Need To Know

  • When Terra Dumas started Common Roots, she didn't have water or electricity

  • Through hard work, the farm is now a success

  • For more information about the farm, click here

“When we started, we didn’t have water or electricity here at all, so we used to run hoses from our friends’ houses," says Terra Dumas, Common Roots Urban Farm owner.

That was in 2012. Dumas says that getting a permit from the city to use the fire hydrant was out of the question. The farm simply couldn’t afford it. Instead, she did what she could to get by. 

“We had barrels lining the farm. We were filling with the hoses and then using watering cans to water. We had this little rinky-dink wash station out here,” adds Dumas.

Though the system wasn’t easy and not sustainable for the long term, Dumas didn’t give up. She had learned the love of gardening from her mom and was determined to find a way for make her farm a success…and she did, eventually joined by farmer Joshua Poodry in 2016.

“It was when Josh came that things really started to come together. We got a well dug here, so now we have our own well water which is really amazing," says Dumas.

The pump used to be run off of a generator because they didn’t have electricity. 

“But then it was last year, we had our own electric pole installed," explains Dumas.

Now, there is electricity at the farm and thriving crop. Situated on one acre of land in the Broadway Fillmore Neighborhood, this farm uses organic and ecologically-sustainable methods. 

Common Roots is part of what is called, "Community Supported Agriculture." It's a method of directly connecting local farmers with their community to provide them with packages of fresh food. This year, CSA was so popular that it sold out. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 31, 2020 at 11:27PM
https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/buffalo/news/2020/10/31/through-hard-work--buffalo-farm-becomes-successful-

Through Hard Work, Buffalo Farm Becomes Successful - Spectrum News

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Zipline Brewing Co. to Release Hard Seltzer Line - Brewbound.com

hard.indah.link

LINCOLN, Neb. — Zipline Brewing Company will release a new line of Hard Seltzer in the coming weeks, expanding Zipline’s portfolio and diversifying their lineup with a selection of unique and delicious flavors utilizing locally sourced ingredients.

“We will be offering the same great quality and natural ingredients in our hard seltzer that we do in our standard beer lineup,” said Marcus Powers, Zipline Co-Founder, noting that the fermentable base of Zipline Hard Seltzer would be beet sugar sourced from the Scottsbluff region. “We’ve tested out all sorts of different combinations of flavors, including some really great local tea blends.”

“Since day one, the Zipline brand has been focused on clean design and clear communication with our customers about what they’re getting.  In our hard seltzer line, we’re literally embodying these principles in a craft beverage,” said Powers

Zipline Hard Seltzer will be the second low-calorie option added to the Zipline portfolio this year, in addition to Local Time Lager, released this spring.

“Local Time is a great option for consumers looking for a great beer that’s low in calories and low in carbs,” said Powers. “ But we’ve seen customers looking for more choices and flavors. Adding Hard Seltzer to our portfolio is great news for those seeking another way to enjoy a light, low calorie craft beverage that compliments their active lifestyle.”

Hard seltzer is the fastest growing segment in the craft category.  Zipline Hard Seltzer will be available on draft in all four Zipline taprooms this fall and in 6-pack clear glass bottles in early 2021.

———

Zipline Brewing Co. crafts artisan ales and lagers with high quality precision in Lincoln, Nebraska. Zipline was born from the founders’ innate sense of adventure and their desire to connect with the thrill-seeking spirit in all craft beer fans. Our approach is clean, simple, and direct to help you focus your energy on enjoying Brave New Brews. For more info, visit www.ziplinebrewing.com 

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


November 01, 2020 at 12:22AM
https://www.brewbound.com/news/zipline-brewing-co-to-release-hard-seltzer-line

Zipline Brewing Co. to Release Hard Seltzer Line - Brewbound.com

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Oregon could decriminalize hard drugs - Columbian.com - The Columbian

hard.indah.link

SALEM, Ore. — In what would be a first in the U.S., possession of small amounts of heroin, cocaine, LSD and other hard drugs could be decriminalized in Oregon under a ballot measure that voters are deciding on in Tuesday’s election.

Measure 110 is one of the most watched initiatives in Oregon because it would drastically change how the state’s justice system treats people caught with amounts for their personal use.

Instead of being arrested, going to trial and facing possible jail time, the users would have the option of paying $100 fines or attending new, free addiction recovery centers.

The centers would be funded by tax revenue from retail marijuana sales in the state that was the country’s first to decriminalize marijuana possession.

It may sound like a radical concept even in one of the most progressive U.S. states — but countries including Portugal, the Netherlands and Switzerland have already decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs, according to the United Nations.

Portugal’s 2000 decriminalization brought no surge in drug use. Drug deaths fell while the number of people treated for drug addiction in the country rose 20 percent from 2001 to 2008 and then stabilized, Portuguese officials have said.

The U.N. Chief Executives Board for Coordination, chaired by Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, is also advocating a different approach.

In a 2019 report, the board announced its commitment to “promote alternatives to conviction and punishment in appropriate cases, including the decriminalization of drug possession for personal use.”

Doing so would also “address prison overcrowding and overincarceration by people accused of drug crimes,” said the board, which is made up of the leaders of all U.N. agencies, funds and other bodies.

Oregon’s measure is backed by the Oregon Nurses Association, the Oregon chapter of the American College of Physicians and the Oregon Academy of Family Physicians.

“Punishing people for drug use and addiction is costly and hasn’t worked. More drug treatment, not punishment, is a better approach,” the groups said in a statement.

Opponents include two dozen district attorneys who urged a no vote, saying the measure “recklessly decriminalizes possession of the most dangerous types of drugs (and) will lead to an increase in acceptability of dangerous drugs.”

Three other district attorneys back the measure, including the top prosecutor in Oregon’s most populous county, which includes Portland, the state’s largest city.

“Misguided drug laws have created deep disparities in the justice system,” said Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt.

“Arresting people with addictions is a cruel punishment because it slaps them with a lifelong criminal record that can ruin lives.”

Jimmy Jones, executive director of Mid-Willamette Valley Community Action, a group that helps homeless people, said arresting people who are using but not dealing hard drugs makes life extremely difficult for them.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 31, 2020 at 08:00PM
https://www.columbian.com/news/2020/oct/31/oregon-could-decriminalize-hard-drugs/

Oregon could decriminalize hard drugs - Columbian.com - The Columbian

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Is it that hard to be kind? Yes, it is, and here’s why – Terry Pluto’s Faith & You - cleveland.com

hard.indah.link

CLEVELAND, Ohio – It was not my finest moment.

That’s what I was thinking after this recent encounter with a young lady working in a health-food place where you can order meals to go.

I tried to hand her a piece of paper, a list of what my wife wanted to eat.

“I can’t take that,” she said, horrified. “IT’S CONTAMINATED!”

I looked at the paper in my hand as if it was about to bite off my fingers.

“It’s my wife’s order," I said. "Do you mind if I read it to you so you get this right?”

She shrugged.

“Look,” I said. “I didn’t walk here just to give you a hard time.”

My tone was in the verbal badlands between sarcastic and condescending.

She ignored me and listened as I read the order.

She struggled and I watched her struggle getting the three items together. She walked down to the register and it took a while for her to ring it up.

She had no other customers. Everything seemed to take forever, although it was no more than 10 minutes.

I gave her the money and a token “thanks” as I left.

Driving home it hit me like a frying pan in the face from one of the old cartoons – SHE WAS NEW ON THE JOB!

She also was by herself. She probably has been scared to death by all the new health regulations. She had on gloves and a mask. Her glasses had steamed up, which happens when working and wearing a mask.

The more I thought about it, I realized it’s a brutal time for people in retail.

What she needed from me was a little kindness and patience.

A comment like, “I bet these jobs are tough right now with COVID” would have put her at ease.

Instead, I was rude.

TRY A LITTLE KINDNESS

I thought of this incident when brainstorming for a faith column idea with one of my friends.

“My wife and I were talking about how it’s not that hard to be kind,” he said. “You know, the Golden Rule."

The Golden Rule is: “Do unto others as you’d have them do unto you.”

In Matthew 22:35-40, Jesus is asked, “What is the greatest commandment?”

He replied: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your mind...the second is Love your neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

I have all that memorized. I have taught it in jail ministry.

But when there was a chance to put it into action with someone who was stressed, I was acting like a 2-year-old who wanted his way, and wanted it right now.

Glen Campbell used to perform a song called Try a Little Kindness that includes this line: “Show a little kindness, just shine your light for everyone to see.”

And when we don’t, we can shut down the light in their eyes.

A BIG QUESTION

Are people naturally kind, giving and patient or are we naturally selfish?

It’s one of those eternal debates.

I fall into the selfish camp, which is a Biblical point of view. I mentioned a 2-year-old. Don’t you have to teach an toddler to share and think about others?

It’s very hard for a child to see the world other than through childish eyes.

Or as my friend said, “You don’t need to tell the kid to be a bully, or quit being so nice."

Consider our thoughts? If we saw a transcript from any given day, what percentage of our thoughts have to do with our agenda? Now compare that to how often we think of others first.

I don’t want to see that transcript, how about you?

Obviously, some of us are far more kind and patient than others. My wife is one. But for many of us, it’s a real spiritual and emotional battle.

TIME & LOVE

There’s old song by Laura Nyro called Time and Love. I hadn’t heard it in years, but it came to mind while writing this. Here’s the chorus:

Time and Love. Nothing cures like Time and Love

Don’t let the devil fool you, here comes the dove...nothing cures like time and love.

OK, this song from 1969 is a nostalgia trip for me because I like Nyro’s music.

But the idea of “time and love..."

It takes time to be kind.

The word “time” comes first because it’s often so hard to give away our time.

Or consider 1 Corinthians 13: 4-5: “Love is patient, love is kind...it is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered.”

Kindness takes time, and St. Paul’s verses first hook love to patience, then to kindness.

And it’s something I need to pray for the strength to give away each day.

RECENT TERRY PLUTO FAITH & YOU

You need to think about what you think about

Driving myself crazy? Perfectionism during the pandemic

Another night with the frogs: Do I want to get well?

Is it worth destroying a close relationship over politics?

The Battle With Rejection

Pioneer Pastor Diana Swoope dies, inspiration to those with cancer.

Fighting the Inner Bully

The trap of wanting to be liked

Feeling stuck in the middle

What to say to someone who has cancer

Michigan’s Upper Peninsula: A land of massive rocks, bugs, bears and beauty

Shelter In Place is rough on those in Nursing Homes

Can you really forgive and forget when it’s so painful?

Stories of parents, kids, pain and hope

Are you agonizing over your trouble child?

When you go the store, do you see the mask-wearing clerk as a person?

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 31, 2020 at 04:23PM
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2020/10/is-it-that-hard-to-be-kind-yes-it-is-and-heres-why-terry-plutos-faith-you.html

Is it that hard to be kind? Yes, it is, and here’s why – Terry Pluto’s Faith & You - cleveland.com

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Friday, October 30, 2020

Hard Freeze Expected Tonight - WNDU

hard.indah.link

SOUTH BEND, Ind. (WNDU) - FANTASTIC FALL WEATHER NEXT WEEK!!! Boy, after a fall that has been slightly colder than normal so far, it will be nice to get some mild weather in early November. It’s sure looking like we get at least 6 straight days of 60+ degree high temperatures. And to go along with those temperatures, we’re looking at lots of sunshine from Monday through Friday, and at least partly sunny skies next weekend. It doesn’t get a whole lot better than that this time of the year. In the mean-time, though, we’re looking at a hard freeze tonight, and the chance for lake-effect snow and rain showers on Sunday. I can’t even rule out a bit of accumulation on the grass...

Tonight: Clearing and cold with a hard freeze likely by morning. Low: 28, Wind: Becoming Calm

Saturday: Lots of sunshine with a breezy and milder afternoon. High: 54, Wind: S 9-18

Saturday night: Breezy and cold with a dry evening. A chance for a shower overnight. Low: 35

Sunday: Windy and cold with lake-effect snow and rain showers at times. High: 39

Copyright 2020 WNDU. All rights reserved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 31, 2020 at 05:10AM
https://www.wndu.com/2020/10/30/hard-freeze-expected-tonight/

Hard Freeze Expected Tonight - WNDU

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Boston tourism braces for a cold spring after a hard winter - BetaBoston

hard.indah.link

The Boston Marathon finish line won't be coming to life in April 2021, with hopes now riding on next fall.Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff

Boston’s convention and tourism industry is already expecting a hard winter and a cold spring, as the COVID-19 pandemic has forced the cancellation or delay of major events that usually attract thousands of visitors to the region and generate millions of dollars.

Traditional winter diversions such as the New England Food Show, auto show, and the RV and camping expo have already been postponed, and some major conventions that usher in spring, such as the PAX East gaming conference, have yet to settle on a date. These follow the announcement this week that the Boston Marathon, one of the signal events of springtime in the city, will be put off until later in the year.

Advertisement



The marathon postponement “is unfortunately a bellwether for so much else on the event horizon,” said Dusty Rhodes, president of Conventures, a Boston-based event planning company.

And a public already suffering cabin fever before the onset of cold weather won’t have traditional end-of-year outlets available, either. No Harvard-Yale game, no Thanksgiving festival in Plymouth. And it looks like Boston First Night, the annual New Year’s Eve celebration that brings 300,000 people to the city, is next.

“We’re about to announce, ‘Well, we can’t do that,’ " said Rhodes, whose company organizes the event and is awaiting official confirmation from City Hall. “Under current Commonwealth mandates, we can’t convene. It’s not safe.”

It’s a series of massive blows to tourism, the state’s third-largest industry, with some 376,000 workers in related business and an estimated $28 billion in output, according to a 2018 study by the University of Massachusetts.

Today the leisure and hospitality sector remains among the hardest hit by the shutdowns, with employment levels in September 18 percent below prepandemic levels, according to Opportunity Insights, a research and public policy initiative based at Harvard University that is tracking the economic effects of the coronavirus.

Advertisement



Still more events are in jeopardy in 2021. Two of the biggest events in January, the New England International Auto Show and the Boston RV & Camping Expo have been pushed back to mid-April.

“We have a lot of patrons who really depend on these shows for entertainment,” said Lowell Briggs, director of marketing for the Paragon Group, the Needham-based company that runs both shows.

The postponement of the car show is also bad news for local car dealers, who count on large crowds at the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center to boost sales of the latest models.

“These shows are kind of an intrinsic part of their marketing strategy, to get out there and reach the public,” Briggs said.

Other major attractions normally slated for March and April are in wait-and-see mode. Organizers of PAX East, which attracts as many as 60,000 visitors to the convention center, still hope they can make it happen.

“Hopefully, PAX East event next year will push through,” the organization said in an e-mail. But they have yet to announce a date for the event. The 2020 edition of PAX East happened in late February, when COVID-19 was a clear problem in Asia but only beginning to gain a foothold in the United States. In a harbinger of the coming crisis, Japanese gaming giant Sony pulled out of the show out of concern over the virus.

Meanwhile, Anime Boston, a festival for fans of Japanese graphic novels and animated films, says it’s still planning for the weekend of April 2, “until such time that we can no longer hold the event," according to a post on the event website. Anime Boston was forced to cancel its March 2020 event at the Hynes Convention Center. Instead, organizers held a one-day virtual festival on Oct. 24. But online gatherings are a poor substitute for in-person conventions, and they do nothing for the local tourism trade.

Advertisement



On Friday, the Massachusetts Restaurant Association said it’s postponing the annual New England Food Show, which had been set for late February, and usually attracts about 8,000 visitors. “It has become clear that holding an event in February of 2021 will not be possible but midyear dates may be ideal,” the association said.

Martha Sheridan, president of the Greater Boston Convention & Visitors Bureau, believes the first quarter of 2021 is a lost cause. “We’re all just hoping that the second quarter is when we’ll start to see some semblance of a rebound,” she said.

Another major trade show, the annual Seafood Expo, is still scheduled for mid-March 2021, according to its website. Organizers of the event did not return messages for more information.

COVID-19 fears forced the postponement of this year’s March Seafood Expo, and its eventual cancellation. It was the first major convention in Boston to be shuttered because of the pandemic. But unknown to anyone at the time, a conference held in late February by the pharmaceutical firm Biogen had already infected dozens of participants, who spread the disease to hundreds of others in Boston and throughout the country.

Advertisement



By mid-March, Boston’s famed St. Patrick’s Day parade was canceled, the Marathon was postponed, and public schools were closed. At the time, it was hoped that public gatherings would resume later in the year, once the virus had been brought under control. Instead, the crisis has only worsened.

Under the Baker administration’s program for controlling the spread of COVID-19, the average daily rate of new infections is too high to safely operate indoor conventions and trade shows, and so venues such as the convention center can’t reopen. As of Friday, Boston’s 14-day average of new COVID cases was nearly 16 per 100,000 residents, putting the city well into in the “red zone" for new infections.

The dearth of events is dashing hopes within the hospitality industry of a major return of business as the one-year mark for the virus approaches.

“I’ve never seen it this bad,” said Paul Sacco, chief executive of the Massachusetts Lodging Association. "And looking into next year, I would have to say the first half of the year will be very disappointing, with no uptick realized.”

Sheridan is working with members of the convention bureau to develop survival strategies, such as an effort to attract local families tired of being cooped up at home: special rates to allow a family to pack up laptops and get out of the house and work or study from a hotel room.

Advertisement



“The hotels will add on certain amenities," Sheridan said. “One of them suggested cookies and milk at bedtime for your kids.”

The hotels could also offer educational tour packages suitable for schoolchildren.

But such efforts can’t compensate for the huge falloff in out-of-town visitors caused by the pandemic, or the damage inflicted on tourism.

“My empathy goes out to the hotel worker, the restaurant worker, or the airport worker whose livelihood was cut off,” said Rhodes. “We were all hoping back in March that we’d be okay by June" 2020, she said. Instead, “we are in a dark holding position.”


Hiawatha Bray can be reached at hiawatha.bray@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @GlobeTechLab.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 31, 2020 at 05:43AM
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/30/business/boston-tourism-braces-cold-spring-after-hard-winter/

Boston tourism braces for a cold spring after a hard winter - BetaBoston

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Oregon could become 1st US state to decriminalize hard drugs - ABC News

hard.indah.link

Measure 110 is one of the most watched initiatives in Oregon because it would drastically change how the state's justice system treats people caught with amounts for their personal use.

Instead of being arrested, going to trial and facing possible jail time, the users would have the option of paying $100 fines or attending new, free addiction recovery centers.

It may sound like a radical concept even in one of the most progressive U.S. states — but countries including Portugal, the Netherlands and Switzerland have already decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs, according to the United Nations.

Portugal's 2000 decriminalization brought no surge in drug use. Drug deaths fell while the number of people treated for drug addiction in the country rose 20% from 2001 to 2008 and then stabilized, Portuguese officials have said.

The U.N. Chief Executives Board for Coordination, chaired by Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, is also advocating a different approach.

In a 2019 report, the board announced its commitment to “promote alternatives to conviction and punishment in appropriate cases, including the decriminalization of drug possession for personal use.”

Doing so would also "address prison overcrowding and overincarceration by people accused of drug crimes,” said the board, which is made up of the leaders of all U.N. agencies, funds and other bodies.

Oregon's measure is backed by the Oregon Nurses Association, the Oregon chapter of the American College of Physicians and the Oregon Academy of Family Physicians.

“Punishing people for drug use and addiction is costly and hasn’t worked. More drug treatment, not punishment, is a better approach,” the groups said in a statement.

Opponents include two dozen district attorneys who urged a no vote, saying the measure “recklessly decriminalizes possession of the most dangerous types of drugs (and) will lead to an increase in acceptability of dangerous drugs.”

Three other district attorneys back the measure, including the top prosecutor in Oregon’s most populous county, which includes Portland, the state's largest city.

“Misguided drug laws have created deep disparities in the justice system," said Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt. "Arresting people with addictions is a cruel punishment because it slaps them with a lifelong criminal record that can ruin lives.”

Jimmy Jones, executive director of Mid-Willamette Valley Community Action, a group that helps homeless people, said arresting people who are using but not dealing hard drugs makes life extremely difficult for them.

“Every time that this happens, not only does that individual enter the criminal justice system but it makes it very difficult for us, on the back end, to house any of these folks because a lot of landlords won’t touch people with recent criminal history,” Jones said. “They won’t touch people with possession charges.”

The measure would decriminalize possession of less than one gram of heroin or methamphetamine; two grams of cocaine; 12 grams of psilocybin mushrooms; 40 doses of LSD, oxycodone or methadone; and one gram or five pills of MDMA.

The new addiction recovery centers that would be launched in the state would be funded by tax revenues from Oregon's legal, regulated marijuana industry.

Marijuana tax revenues collected by the state in excess of $45 million annually would fund the centers. Doing so would reduce the amount given to schools, the state police, mental health programs and local governments, according to the ballot measure's financial impact statement published by the Oregon secretary of state.

Opponents have seized on the funding reductions in an attempt to sway voters to vote against the measure and have also said that decriminalizing hard drugs would make young people more likely to start using them.

The state's voters in 2014 legalized recreational use and sale of marijuana. But it passed by fewer than 200,000 votes of the 1.5 million counted.

Given that margin, the more controversial hard drugs decriminalization measure is unlikely to pass, said Catherine Bolzendahl, director of Oregon State University's School of Public Policy.

But Christopher McKnight Nichols, associate professor of history at Oregon State University, said it's hard to gauge the outcome because voter participation seems headed for a historic high, with many first-time voters.

“We don’t know as much about their preferences,” Nichols said.

If Oregon's voters reject Measure 110, "it may well pass next time, which has been the model for marijuana legalization, for instance, across the country,” Nichols said.

The measure's political action committee, More Treatment for a Better Oregon: Yes on 110, received a $500,000 donation from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Dr. Priscilla Chan via the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, which supports science and education work and promotes criminal justice reform.

“If the measure passes, Oregon will shift to a health-based approach to drugs and addiction,” the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative's website says.

———

Associated Press writer Barry Hatton in Lisbon, Portugal, contributed to this story.

———

Follow Andrew Selsky on Twitter at https://twitter.com/andrewselsky

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 31, 2020 at 03:44AM
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/oregon-1st-us-state-decriminalize-hard-drugs-73932283

Oregon could become 1st US state to decriminalize hard drugs - ABC News

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Zipline Brewing Co. to release hard seltzer line - KOLN

hard.indah.link

LINCOLN, Neb. (KOLN) - Zipline Brewing Company will release a new line of hard seltzer in the coming weeks, expanding Zipline’s portfolio and diversifying its lineup.

“We will be offering the same great quality and natural ingredients in our hard seltzer that we do in our standard beer lineup,” said Marcus Powers, Zipline Co-Founder, noting that the fermentable base of Zipline Hard Seltzer would be beet sugar sourced from the Scottsbluff region.

“We’ve tested out all sorts of different combinations of flavors, including some really great local tea blends."

”Since day one, the Zipline brand has been focused on clean design and clear communication with our customers about what they’re getting. In our hard seltzer line, we’re literally embodying these principles in a craft beverage," said Powers.

Zipline Hard Seltzer will be the second low-calorie option added to the Zipline portfolio this year, in addition to Local Time Lager, released this spring.

“Local Time is a great option for consumers looking for a great beer that’s low in calories and low in carbs,” said Powers.

“But we’ve seen customers looking for more choices and flavors. Adding Hard Seltzer to our portfolio is great news for those seeking another way to enjoy a light, low calorie craft beverage that compliments their active lifestyle.”

Hard seltzer is the fastest growing segment in the craft category. Zipline Hard Seltzer will be available on draft in all four Zipline taprooms this fall and in 6-pack clear glass bottles in early 2021.

Copyright 2020 KOLN. All rights reserved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 30, 2020 at 07:28PM
https://www.1011now.com/2020/10/30/zipline-brewing-co-to-release-hard-seltzer-line/

Zipline Brewing Co. to release hard seltzer line - KOLN

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Thursday, October 29, 2020

Congress Fails to Ask Tech CEOs the Hard Questions - EFF

hard.indah.link

The Big Internet Companies Are Too Powerful, But Undermining Section 230 Won’t Help

The Senate Commerce Committee met this week to question the heads of Facebook, Twitter, and Google about Section 230, the most important law protecting free speech online. Section 230 reflects the common-sense principle that legal liability for unlawful online speech should rest with the speaker, not the Internet services that make online speech possible. Section 230 further protects Internet companies’ ability to make speech moderation decisions by making it clear that platforms can make those decisions without inviting liability for the mistakes they will inevitably make.

Even President Trump has called multiple times for a repeal of Section 230, though repealing the law would certainly mean far fewer places for conservatives to share their ideas online, not more.

Section 230’s importance to free speech online can’t be overstated. Without Section 230, social media wouldn’t exist, at least in its current form. Neither would most forums, comment sections, or other places where people are allowed to interact and share their ideas with each other. The legal risk involved with operating such a space would simply be too high. Simply put, the Internet would be a less interactive, more restrictive place without Section 230.

If some critics of Section 230 get their way, the Internet will soon become a more restrictive place. Section 230 has become a lightning rod this year: it’s convenient for politicians and commentators on both sides of the aisle to blame the law—which protects a huge range of Internet services—for the decisions of a few very large companies (usually Google, Twitter, and Facebook). Republicans make questionable claims about bias against conservatives, arguing that platforms should be required to moderate less speech in order to maintain liability protections. Even President Trump has called multiple times for a repeal of Section 230, though repealing the law would certainly mean far fewer places for conservatives to share their ideas online, not more. Democrats often argue the opposite, saying that the law should be changed to require platforms to do more to patrol hate speech and disinformation.

The questions and comments in this week’s hearing followed that familiar pattern, with Republicans scolding Big Tech for “censoring” and fact-checking conservative speech—the president’s in particular—and Democrats demanding that tech companies do more to curb misleading and harmful statements on their platforms—the president’s in particular. Lost in the charade is a stark reality: undermining 230 wouldn’t necessarily improve platforms’ behavior but would bring severe consequences for speech online as a whole.

Three Internet Giants Don’t Speak for the Internet

One of the problems with the current debate over Section 230 is that it’s treated as a discussion about big tech companies. But Section 230 affects all of us. When volunteer moderators take action in small web discussion forums—they’re protected by Section 230. When a hobbyist blogger removes spam or other inappropriate material from a comment section—again, protected by Section 230. And when an Internet user retweets a tweet or even forwards an email, Section 230 protects that user too.

Internet censorship invariably harms the least powerful members of society first.

There were a lot of disappointing mistakes made in this hearing, but the first and worst mistake was deciding who to call to speak in the first place. Hauling the CEOs of Facebook, Google, and Twitter in front of Congress to be the sole witnesses defending a law that affects the entire Internet may be good political theatre, but it's a terrible way to make technology policy. By definition, the three largest tech companies alone can’t provide a clear picture of what rewriting Section 230 would mean to the entire Internet.

All three of these CEOs run companies that will be able to manage nearly any level of government regulation or intervention. That’s not true of the thousands of small startups that don’t have the resources of world-spanning companies. It’s no surprise that Facebook, for instance, is now signaling an openness to more government regulation of the Internet—far from being a death blow for the company, it may well help the social media giant isolate itself from competition.

Dorsey, Zuckerberg, and Pichai don’t just fail to represent the breadth of Internet companies that would be affected by a change to Section 230; as three men in positions of enormous power, they also fail to represent the Internet users that Congress would harm. Internet censorship invariably harms the least powerful members of society first—the rural LGBTQ teenager who depends on the acceptance of Internet communities, the activist using social media to document government abuses of human rights. When online platforms clamp down on their users’ speech, it’s the marginalized voices that disappear first.

Facebook’s Call for Regulation Doesn’t Address the Big Problems

In his opening testimony, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg made it clear why we can’t trust him to be a witness on Section 230, endorsing changes to Section 230 that would give Facebook an advantage over would-be competitors. Zuckerberg acknowledged the foundational role that Section 230 has played in the development of the Internet, but he also suggested that “Congress should update the law to make sure that it’s working as intended.” He went on to propose that Congress should pass laws requiring platforms to be more transparent in their moderation decisions. He also advocated legislation to “separate good actors from bad actors.” From Zuckerberg’s written testimony (PDF):

At Facebook, we don’t think tech companies should be making so many decisions about these important issues alone. I believe we need a more active role for governments and regulators, which is why in March last year I called for regulation on harmful content, privacy, elections, and data portability.

EFF recognizes some of what Zuckerberg identifies as the problems with today’s social media platforms—indeed, we have criticized Facebook for providing inadequate transparency into its own moderation processes—but that doesn’t mean Facebook should speak for the Internet. Any reform that puts more burden on platforms in order to maintain the Section 230 liability shield will mean a higher barrier for new startups to overcome before they can compete with Facebook or Google, be it in the form of moderation staff, investment in algorithmic filters, or the high-powered lawyers necessary to fight off new lawsuits. If it becomes harder for platforms to receive and maintain Section 230 protections, then Google, Facebook, and Twitter will become even more dominant over the Internet. This conglomeration happened very dramatically after Congress passed SESTA/FOSTA. The law, which Facebook supported, made it much harder for online dating services to operate without massive legal risk, and multiple small dating sites recognized that reality and immediately shut down. Just a few weeks later, Facebook announced that it was entering the online dating market.

Unsurprisingly, while the witnesses paid lip service to the importance of competition among online services, none of them proposed solutions to their outsized control over online speech. None of them proposed comprehensive data privacy legislation that would let users sue the big tech companies when they violate our privacy rights. None of them proposed modernizing antitrust law to stop the familiar pattern of big tech companies simply buying their would-be competitors. Many members of Congress—Republican and Democrat—recognized that the failings they blamed on large tech companies were magnified by the lack of meaningful competition among online speech platforms, but unfortunately, very little of the hearing focused on real solutions to that lack of competition.

Give Users Real Control Over Their Online Experience

Republican Senators’ insistence on framing the hearing around “censorship of conservatives” precluded a more serious discussion of the problems with online platforms’ aggressive speech enforcement practices. As we’ve said before, online censorship magnifies existing imbalances in society: it’s not the liberal silencing the conservative; it’s the powerful silencing the powerless. Any serious discussion of the problems with platforms’ moderation practices must consider the ways in which powerful players—including state actors—take advantage of those moderation practices in order to censor their enemies.

EFF told Congress in 2018 that although it’s not lawmakers’ place to tell Internet companies what speech to keep up or take down, there are serious problems with how social media platforms enforce their policies and what voices disappear from the Internet. We said that Internet companies had a lot more work to do to ensure that their moderation decisions were fair and transparent and that when mistakes inevitably happened, users would be able to appeal moderation decisions to a real person, not an algorithm.

Social media companies make thousands of decisions on our behalf. Why not expose those decisions to users and let us have some say in them?

We also suggested that platforms ought to put more control over what speech we’re allowed to see into the hands of us, the users. Today, social media companies make thousands of decisions on our behalf—about whether we’ll see sexual speech and imagery, whether we’ll see certain types of misinformation, what types of extremist speech we’ll be exposed to. Why not expose those decisions to users and let us have some say in them? As we wrote in our letter to the House Judiciary Committee, “Facebook  already  allows  users  to  choose  what  kinds  of  ads  they want to see—a similar system should be put in place for content, along with tools that let  users  make  those  decisions  on  the  fly  rather  than  having  to  find  a  hidden  interface.”

We were gratified, then, that Twitter’s Jack Dorsey identified “empowering algorithmic choice” as a high priority for the company. From Dorsey’s written testimony (PDF):

In December 2018, Twitter introduced an icon located at the top of everyone’s timeline that allows individuals using Twitter to easily switch to a reverse chronological order ranking of the Tweets from accounts or topics they follow. This improvement gives people more control over the content they see, and it also provides greater transparency into how our algorithms affect what they see. It is a good start. We believe this points to an exciting, market-driven approach where people can choose what algorithms filter their content so they can have the experience they want. [...] Enabling people to choose algorithms created by third parties to rank and filter their content is an incredibly energizing idea that is in reach.

We hope to see more of that logical approach to empowering users from a major Internet company, but we also need to hold Twitter and its peers accountable to it. As Dorsey noted in its testimony, true algorithmic choice would mean not only letting people customize how Twitter filters their news feed, but letting third parties create alternative filters too. Unfortunately, the large Internet companies have a poor track record when it comes to letting their services play well with others, employing a mix of copyright abuse, end-user license agreements, and computer crime laws to prevent third parties from creating tools that interact with their own. While we applaud Twitter’s interest in giving users more control over their timeline, we must ensure that its solutions actually promote a competitive landscape and don’t further lock users into Twitter’s own walled garden.

While Internet companies’ moderation practices are a problem, the Senate Commerce Committee hearing ultimately failed to address the real problems with speech moderation at scale. While members of Congress acknowledge that a few flawed companies have too much control over online speech, they’ve consistently failed to enact structural solutions to the lack of meaningful competition in social media. Before they consider making further changes to Section 230, lawmakers must understand that the decisions they make could spell disaster—not just for Facebook and Twitter’s would-be competitors but, most importantly, for the voices they risk kicking offline.

No matter what happens in next week’s election, we are certain to see more misguided attempts to undermine Section 230 in the next Congress. We hope that Congress will take the time to listen to experts and users that don’t run behemoth Internet companies. In the meantime, please take a moment to write to your members of Congress and tell them why a strong Section 230 is important to you.

Take Action

Tell Congress to Reject the Earn It Act

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 30, 2020 at 05:31AM
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/10/congress-fails-ask-tech-ceos-hard-questions

Congress Fails to Ask Tech CEOs the Hard Questions - EFF

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Trump’s Hard-Line Immigration Policies Go Before Voters - The New York Times

hard.indah.link

McALLEN, Texas — The leadership of the Department of Homeland Security gathered on Thursday under the shadow of 30-foot, black-painted, steel bollards to promote the near completion of 400 miles of President Trump’s border wall.

The politics of the moment, five days before the election, was lost on no one.

“The only reason we haven’t reached another crisis is because of the policies and procedures this administration put into place over the last several years, including the construction of an effective border wall system,” Chad F. Wolf, the acting homeland security secretary, told reporters, photographers and cameramen. “Abolishing these measures or reversing course is absolutely no way forward.”

Immigration has not been a central theme of the race between Mr. Trump and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., the Democratic nominee, but the future of some of the president’s hard-line policies at the border will be determined by the results.

The Department of Homeland Security has been racing to deliver on Mr. Trump’s promise of 450 miles of border wall before the end of the year. The agency is still about a week away from the 400-mile marker, according to Customs and Border Protection officials, and nearly all of the construction has been in areas where dilapidated fencing or vehicle barriers already stood.

But the steel structure on the border, built without congressional approval, is something of a monument to the president’s determination. It has affected the environment, private property owners and, homeland security officials say, the job of border agents.

Department leaders in recent days have traversed the nation, including in battleground states, to emphasize routine arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, criticize Democrats and blast so-called sanctuary city policies. The agency has also erected billboards in Pennsylvania to warn of the dangers posed by undocumented immigrants.

All of that has amplified criticism that the department has become an arm of the Trump campaign.

“There are partisan politics behind it, not operational reasons,” said David Lapan, a former spokesman for the Departments of Homeland Security and Defense under Mr. Trump. “Over the time of the Trump administration, D.H.S. has been seen as more and more politicized.”

The nonprofit government watchdog American Oversight requested that the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general investigate whether the senior leadership had violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in political activities on the job.

Credit...Sergio Flores for The New York Times

Standing in front of a line of Border Patrol agents, Mr. Wolf dismissed the criticism and defended policies that have effectively halted migration across the southwest border, leaving families in squalid tent camps in some of the most dangerous areas in Mexico.

The homeland security officials also attacked the policy proposals of Mr. Biden, who has pledged to immediately halt wall construction and end the Remain in Mexico program that has forced tens of thousands of migrants to wait in Mexico for court hearings on asylum claims.

Mark A. Morgan, the acting commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, said policies embraced by Mr. Biden would prompt a migrant “invasion,” though he acknowledged in a separate interview that most migrants who crossed the border last year were not criminals but rather Central American families fleeing poverty.

Asked in an interview if he was concerned his language could create the perception of a violent threat, Mr. Morgan responded defensively.

“That’s what people immediately want to go to, is that we’re being xenophobic, we’re racist, right?” he said, adding: “I have no problem saying that the overwhelming majority of those trying to illegally enter the United States are not bad people, right? But some are. So my question is, how many?”

Most illegal crossings into the United States in recent years have been in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas, but only seven miles of the wall have been constructed in the area.

Private landowners in South Texas say the wall will cut through their farmlands and properties; they have forced the Trump administration to go through the arduous process of asserting eminent domain in court. To make good on Mr. Trump’s promised 450 miles, the administration has concentrated construction in areas owned by the federal government, over terrain that already impedes border crossers.

Chief Rodney S. Scott of Border Patrol conceded that the Rio Grande Valley “was higher priority for the U.S. Border Patrol.” But, he added, “we elected to go ahead and shift down to a lower priority because I could make a difference there and then.”

That approach has damaged ecosystems and disrupted the migration of endangered wildlife, said Laiken Jordahl, a borderlands campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity.

“This 400-mile celebration is not insignificant,” he said. “This is something communities and Indigenous nations across the borderlands are mourning. This marks 400 miles of destruction.”

The Trump administration has secured about $15 billion to build 731 miles of border wall, with much of the money transferred from the Defense Department and funds that had been appropriated by Congress for military construction projects and narcotics interdiction.

With the president’s deadline nearing, the government has stepped up litigation against landowners in South Texas. It has filed 106 lawsuits against landowners this year to survey, seize and potentially begin construction, an increase from 27 lawsuits filed in 2019, said Ricky Garza, a staff lawyer for the Texas Civil Rights Project. The federal government filed 22 cases in September alone.

“This is an attack on our culture, our heritage, our very identity, and that is why we are fighting,” said Melissa Cigarroa, a landowner who said the government had threatened to sue her for access to her property in Zapata County, Texas. “We feel it viscerally.”

Homeland security officials say the border wall is critical. It has allowed the agency to funnel migration into specific areas, where they can strategically place Border Patrol agents to apprehend migrants. They say it has freed those agents to make more arrests rather than respond to families seeking protection.

This month, the agency is expected to record the highest monthly total of illegal crossings for the year, Mr. Wolf said. But the blockade on asylum came not from a wall of steel but a web of policy changes, especially the Remain in Mexico policy, which has forced more than 60,000 migrants back to Mexico to await court dates to have their asylum claims assessed.

The department has also used a public health emergency declaration to rapidly return migrants, including unaccompanied children, to Mexico or their home countries without providing chances to have their asylum claims heard.

While the department has said the rule has prevented the spread of disease in the United States, immigration lawyers say it conflicts with immigration laws that say migrants must have a chance to have their fear of persecution in their home countries heard when they step on U.S. soil.

Credit...Sergio Flores for The New York Times

Mr. Morgan again pushed back.

“There are times when someone’s want and need to claim asylum is superseded by something of far greater value,” he said, “and that’s lives of American citizens.”

He added that migrants were still provided the opportunity to have fear of torture assessed by an immigration officer, although that screening carries a much higher bar than screenings for persecution.

Mr. Morgan said the Mexican government had not verified reports of widespread violence against migrants in Mexico. But immigration advocacy organizations have recorded hundreds of attacks against those forced by the United States to return to Mexico, with some disseminating recordings of extortion attempts by cartels.

Mr. Morgan blamed the migrants.

“They’re intentionally leaving the sheltered environment, re-engaging the smuggling organizations, even when they’ve been told not to, to try to get illegally in the United States,” he said. “That’s when they’re exposing themselves.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 30, 2020 at 08:30AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/29/us/politics/trump-immigration-policies-election.html

Trump’s Hard-Line Immigration Policies Go Before Voters - The New York Times

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

‘Hard-Nosed Football’ | Ravens’ Rookies To Get First Taste Of Steelers Rivalry Sunday - CBS Baltimore

hard.indah.link

BALTIMORE (WJZ) — Any football fan who has been in Baltimore even a short period of time is aware of the Ravens-Steelers rivalry.

The two teams meet twice a year in what’s considered the hardest-hitting series in the sport.

Rookie linebacker Patrick Queen has his sites set on the steelers. He’s preparing for his first foray into the famed rivalry.

The veterans tell the new players every year: you’re not a Raven until you play against Pittsburgh, and several Ravens are about to experience it for the first time Sunday.

BALTIMORE, MD – OCTOBER 11: Patrick Queen #48 of the Baltimore Ravens looks on before the game against the Cincinnati Bengals at M&T Bank Stadium on October 11, 2020 in Baltimore, Maryland. (Photo by Scott Taetsch/Getty Images)

“Hard-nosed football,” Queen said. “That’s about it. Growing up, watching football, you don’t know much about the game but you just see all the emotions coming into it… the hard-hitting. That’s what kids growing up look at how people play. That’s the main thing I looked at growing up is just how hard they hit and the energy that they brought every game.”

“You get excited for the rookies who haven’t played in this game because they’ve heard about it, they’ve read about it, they’ve watched them, but they haven’t played in it yet,” Ravens defensive coordinator Wink Martindale said. “After they play in it you go up to them and say, ‘See what I was talking about?'”

Notable injury absences: running back Mark Ingram II and defensive back Jimmy Smith both did not practice Thursday because of injuries.

Marlon Humphrey is back after sitting out Wednesday with an illness.

Ravens-Steelers, a battle for first place. Pittsburgh comes to town as the only unbeaten team in the NFL.

You can catch the vacation from Sunday’s game right here on WJZ.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 30, 2020 at 06:15AM
https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2020/10/29/ravens-rookies-to-get-first-taste-of-steelers-rivalry-hard-nosed-football/

‘Hard-Nosed Football’ | Ravens’ Rookies To Get First Taste Of Steelers Rivalry Sunday - CBS Baltimore

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Report: The pandemic has hit newspapers hard - Poynter

hard.indah.link

The coronavirus pandemic has caused the loss of life, jobs and homes. According to a new study, it also hit U.S. newspapers particularly hard.

On Thursday, the Pew Research Center released a report on “the financial state of the news media in the second quarter of 2020.” The report looks at newspapers, cable and broadcast news. “Quarterly data is not available for radio, public broadcasting or digital news companies.”

In that time, median ad revenue at six newspaper chains made up of more than 300 daily newspapers fell 42% compared with the second quarter of 2019.

Related: Here are the newsroom layoffs, furloughs and closures caused by the coronavirus pandemic

“By contrast, total ad revenue across the three major cable news networks was steady overall, but there were sharp differences between the networks: While ad revenue for MSNBC and CNN declined by double digits, Fox News Channel’s revenue rose by 41%.”

At five local TV news companies, with more than 600 individual stations, revenue was also down, but retransmission fees covered the losses. 

Here are some highlights from the report:

  • Among the six newspaper companies studied, Gannett saw the lowest decline in year over year revenue at 35%.
  • In the second quarter of the year, circulation revenue dropped a median of 8%.
  • The impact of the virus includes a continued loss in newsroom jobs. “Of the four companies that reported compensation expenses in the second quarter of 2020, all showed a double-digit percentage decline year over year, with a median decline across the four of 20 percentage points.”
  • At five local TV companies, ad revenue fell by a median of 24%. 
  • Local political ad revenue is lower than in 2018 but higher than 2016. 
  • Network nightly news ad revenue grew by 11% year over year.
  • Network morning news shows lost 4% of ad revenue year over year.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 30, 2020 at 02:22AM
https://www.poynter.org/business-work/2020/report-the-pandemic-has-hit-newspapers-hard/

Report: The pandemic has hit newspapers hard - Poynter

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

OKEx, Still Paralyzed by Founder's Arrest, Details Plans for Bitcoin Cash Hard Fork - CoinDesk

hard.indah.link

Cryptocurrency deposit withdrawals are still suspended at the OKEx exchange following a founder’s recent arrest, but officials with the Malta-based company are moving ahead with other matters, including planning around an upcoming hard fork on the Bitcoin Cash blockchain.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 30, 2020 at 04:02AM
https://www.coindesk.com/okex-bitcoin-cash-hard-fork

OKEx, Still Paralyzed by Founder's Arrest, Details Plans for Bitcoin Cash Hard Fork - CoinDesk

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Coronavirus-Driven Downturn Hits Newspapers Hard as TV News Thrives - Pew Research Center's Journalism Project

hard.indah.link

The financial state of the U.S. news media in the second quarter of 2020

How we did this

U.S. news media sectors experience widely varying economic impacts of coronavirus downturnThe coronavirus outbreak has had a major impact on the U.S. economy, wiping out five years of growth in the second quarter of 2020. The news media have responded to these financial pressures with new closings and layoffs, adding to those that have already occurred over the last several years – though the government’s paycheck protection loans program may have provided some relief. But not all sectors, or organizations, have been affected equally.

Newspaper companies have been hit especially hard. Among the six publicly traded newspaper companies studied – major chains that own over 300 daily papers – advertising revenue fell by a median of 42% year over year (i.e., comparing the second quarter of 2020 with the second quarter of 2019). By contrast, total ad revenue across the three major cable news networks was steady overall, but there were sharp differences between the networks: While ad revenue for MSNBC and CNN declined by double digits, Fox News Channel’s revenue rose by 41%.

What is a median, and why is it used to measure change here?

Ad revenue for the five local TV news companies studied (which together own or operate at least 600 individual stations) was also down in the second quarter of this year, but increases in retransmission fees more than made up for this. Meanwhile, ad revenue for nightly network TV news at the three broadcast networks (ABC, CBS and NBC) increased over the same period, as audiences have been turning to TV in record numbers for news about the outbreak.

The rest of this report looks at each of these four sectors of the news industry in more detail.

Early in pandemic, U.S. newspapers saw sharp declines in ad revenue

U.S. newspapers have been in a long economic downturn. While some national newspaper brands have reported audience growth in recent years, the industry overall (which extends to hundreds of local papers throughout the country) experienced a sharp decline in ad revenue amid the Great Recession and has yet to recover.

Amid coronavirus pandemic, newspaper ad revenue falls sharply in 2020

Ad revenue historically has been the industry’s biggest single revenue stream, although many newspapers have made efforts in recent years to orient their business models more around revenue directly from readers – such as through online or print subscriptions. Despite this, overall circulation and subscription revenue has barely budged over the past 10 years.

Now, with the coronavirus-driven downturn, the six publicly traded newspaper companies analyzed here (which collectively own over 300 newspapers) have seen a year-over-year fall in both types of revenue.

The median ad revenue among these publicly traded newspaper companies fell by 42% in the second quarter of 2020 when compared with the second quarter of 2019. This pattern was similar for all six newspaper companies analyzed here, with even the least-affected company, Gannett, showing a 35% decline in ad revenue year over year.

Digital ads represent a newer source of revenue for newspapers as their overall circulation declines. Such ads can reach not only subscribers, but visitors to the free offerings on newspapers’ websites. But digital ad revenue offered little relief in the early days of the pandemic. Digital ad revenue fell by a median of 32% year over year in the second quarter. (See Appendix for detailed tables with full data.)

Circulation revenue, which has been steady in recent years, declined in Q2 2020, though by a median of only 8%. Even at the worst-hit companies (Gannett and Lee), circulation revenue declined by a relatively low 14%. As a result, three of these six companies now have more revenue coming in from circulation than from ads – an unthinkable state of affairs a decade ago, when overall ad revenue was two-and-a-half times higher than overall circulation revenue.

For example, Belo brought in similar amounts from subscriptions and circulation and from ads (about $16 million for each) in the second quarter of 2020. By comparison, in the second quarter of 2010, Belo brought in $77 million in ad revenue and $35.5 million from subscriptions and circulation.

Newspaper circulation revenue declined in Q2 2020, but not as much as ad revenue

In percentage terms, newspaper companies that reported revenue in both periods seemed to fare worse financially this spring than they did during the Great Recession of December 2007 through June 2009. Ad revenue for newspaper companies also dipped sharply during the Great Recession, with median declines of 11% and 30%, respectively, in the second quarters of 2008 and 2009 among these companies (see Appendix for detailed tables). Still, this does not match the dramatic year-over-year median fall of 42% in the second quarter of 2020. And circulation revenue was roughly steady in 2008 and 2009, compared with the 8% median year-over-year decline in the second quarter of 2020.

Some newspaper companies have turned to other sources of revenue to fill the gap left by falling ad revenue. This includes revenue from events, marketing services, commercial printing, affiliate fees from product recommendations, and – for The New York Times, at least – television shows. But these sources did not offer much help in the second quarter of 2020, as most companies saw their “other” revenue decline by double digits. This was especially notable for the Times, which experienced substantial year-over-year increases in this “other” revenue in the second quarters of 2018 and 2019 (40% and 30%, respectively) before a 5% drop in that period in 2020.

In a time of falling revenue, companies may be moved to cut expenses – such as payroll. Of the four companies that reported compensation expenses in the second quarter of 2020, all showed a double-digit percentage decline year over year, with a median decline across the four of 20 percentage points. For most of these companies, this figure has been falling steadily over the past decade or more, reflecting the 51% decline in newspaper newsroom jobs between 2008 and 2019.

Newspaper wage and compensation expenses continue long decline

Sharp differences in revenue across cable news networks

Cable news ad revenue varies by network in early days of pandemic: Fox News rises, CNN and MSNBC fall In contrast with newspapers, the three major cable news networks have seen their ad revenue grow steadily over the past decade. In many ways, the second quarter of 2020 was not extraordinarily unusual for the cable news networks: Total ad revenue across the three networks was roughly steady, up 2% year over year, at $422 million.

But the story was very different depending on the network. Fox News Channel, driven by surging ratings, experienced its sharpest year-over-year second-quarter ad revenue increase going back to 2007, rising 41%. But CNN and MSNBC both saw their ad revenue decline, with CNN’s falling 14% and MSNBC’s falling 27% – despite the fact that both networks grew their audiences as well, with CNN more than doubling its total primetime audience over the year prior. In other words, with many people subject to stay-at-home orders in the spring, Americans were watching cable TV news in greater numbers. But this did not lead to greater revenues across the board – which could be due to a number of factors.

Local TV news companies grow their retransmission fees even as ad dollars wane

Among five publicly traded local TV companies that reported detailed revenue in the second quarter of this year, ad revenue fell by a median of 24%. Together, these companies own or operate over 600 stations across the U.S.

Ad revenue at local TV companies down in second quarter of 2020

More specifically, revenue from political ads for local TV news is predictably cyclical, with even-numbered election years seeing a surge in political ad dollars. Indeed, political advertising revenue was up dramatically for all five companies in the second quarter of 2020 compared with 2019. But when comparing this year with the midterm election year of 2018, political ad revenue was down for most of these companies – including by margins of more than 30% between the second quarter of 2018 and the second quarter of 2020 for Nexstar, Sinclair and Tegna. Looking further back, however, the data shows that political ad revenue for local TV companies is up across the board compared with the last presidential election year of 2016.

Local TV political ad revenue in Q2 down from 2018, but higher than 2016

For some time now, local TV stations have had a second source of revenue: retransmission fees paid by cable providers for the right to carry the local stations in their home markets. And these were up sharply in the second quarter of 2020: Retransmission fee revenue at publicly traded local TV companies saw a median year-over-year increase of 37%, possibly driven by spikes in viewership. In real dollars, this equates to a jump of $87.3 million in median revenue, more than making up for the fall in median advertising revenue among these companies ($67.9 million). Sinclair had the biggest jump in retransmission revenue of any company – up 175% year over year, from $367 million in the second quarter of 2019 to more than $1 billion in the second quarter of this year. In the second quarter of 2020, median retransmission fees were 46% higher than median advertising revenue among these local TV companies.

Local TV retransmission revenue up sharply during coronavirus-driven downtown

Nightly network TV revenues increase as ratings soar

Nightly network TV news ad revenue up 11% in second quarter of 2020Audiences have been turning to the network nightly news in record numbers during the coronavirus outbreak, outpacing even cable’s gains, so it is not surprising that network TV news advertising revenue has increased as well.

Total network nightly news ad revenue rose 11% year over year as of the second quarter this year, outpacing its performance in the comparable presidential election years of 2016 (up 5% year over year) and 2012 (up 5%). This is driven by ABC’s 21% rise, though CBS (3%) and NBC (7%) also rose.

Morning network TV news revenue down slightly in second quarter of 2020The story has been different for network morning news shows. Total ad revenue across the three networks fell 4% year over year in the second quarter, which is somewhat unusual compared with the presidential election years of 2016 (up 2% year over year) and 2012 (up 4%). ABC’s ad revenue was roughly unchanged, while CBS and NBC experienced modest declines in the second quarter of 2020.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

The Link Lonk


October 30, 2020 at 02:03AM
https://www.journalism.org/2020/10/29/coronavirus-driven-downturn-hits-newspapers-hard-as-tv-news-thrives/

Coronavirus-Driven Downturn Hits Newspapers Hard as TV News Thrives - Pew Research Center's Journalism Project

https://news.google.com/search?q=hard&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en

Featured Post

Why it's so hard for Democrats to replace Joe Biden — even after disastrous debate - National Post

hard.indah.link Breadcrumb Trail Links World News There is no evidence Biden is willing to end his campaign. And it would be near...

Popular Posts